<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking for a New Blogging Solution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.adeishs.com/2010/01/looking-for-a-new-blogging-solution.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.adeishs.com/2010/01/looking-for-a-new-blogging-solution.html</link>
	<description>Musical Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 04:52:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ade ishs: New Blog. Kinda.</title>
		<link>http://blog.adeishs.com/2010/01/looking-for-a-new-blogging-solution.html#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>ade ishs: New Blog. Kinda.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.adeishs.com/?p=32#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] time ago, I mentioned that I needed to find a new blogging solution. The news is that, I’ve got one already, with some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time ago, I mentioned that I needed to find a new blogging solution. The news is that, I’ve got one already, with some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ade ishs</title>
		<link>http://blog.adeishs.com/2010/01/looking-for-a-new-blogging-solution.html#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>ade ishs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.adeishs.com/?p=32#comment-12</guid>
		<description>@Rick: Thanks for your comment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yeah, I tried Blogger Custom Domains some time ago, and it was exactly like what you explained.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Re navbar, to me it just doesn&#039;t feel right having the code load it only to have it hidden latter. Why load it in the first place (even assuming it is cached)? And as I said, I don&#039;t mind leaving the navbar there as long as it&#039;s as customisable at least as I specified in my post.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Good to know that you&#039;ll change the presentation of search results. That&#039;s great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rick: Thanks for your comment.</p>
<p>Yeah, I tried Blogger Custom Domains some time ago, and it was exactly like what you explained.</p>
<p>Re navbar, to me it just doesn&#39;t feel right having the code load it only to have it hidden latter. Why load it in the first place (even assuming it is cached)? And as I said, I don&#39;t mind leaving the navbar there as long as it&#39;s as customisable at least as I specified in my post.</p>
<p>Good to know that you&#39;ll change the presentation of search results. That&#39;s great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Klau</title>
		<link>http://blog.adeishs.com/2010/01/looking-for-a-new-blogging-solution.html#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Klau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.adeishs.com/?p=32#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Hi Ade -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ll address Blogger&#039;s abilities relative to your &quot;What I Need&quot; section:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Free: Yes.&lt;br /&gt;2. Customizable Template: Yes, and with Layouts (the upgraded version of templates) you get even more control/functionality than you now have with custom templates.&lt;br /&gt;3. Static HTML page rendering: Technically, we aren&#039;t rendering every blog page, but the effect to the end user is as if we are. (We operate a robust server configuration that uses edge caching, and monitor latency around the world. We are working on improving latency generally, but the user-visible pageloads are faster on custom domains than they&#039;d be on most webhosts.)&lt;br /&gt;4. Keep current permalinks: Yes.&lt;br /&gt;5. Manual HTML input: Yes.&lt;br /&gt;6. Web-based UI: Yes.&lt;br /&gt;7. Secure data transmission: Yes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Re: Custom Domains: You can use CSS to hide the navbar. (It has no user-visible impact in terms of pageload, due to the caching that&#039;s done. So use CSS to hide the navbar and you&#039;re fine.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;ve actually mocked up a change to search results that would be much more Google-like; probably won&#039;t happen this quarter but it&#039;s on our list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ade -</p>
<p>I&#39;ll address Blogger&#39;s abilities relative to your &quot;What I Need&quot; section:</p>
<p>1. Free: Yes.<br />2. Customizable Template: Yes, and with Layouts (the upgraded version of templates) you get even more control/functionality than you now have with custom templates.<br />3. Static HTML page rendering: Technically, we aren&#39;t rendering every blog page, but the effect to the end user is as if we are. (We operate a robust server configuration that uses edge caching, and monitor latency around the world. We are working on improving latency generally, but the user-visible pageloads are faster on custom domains than they&#39;d be on most webhosts.)<br />4. Keep current permalinks: Yes.<br />5. Manual HTML input: Yes.<br />6. Web-based UI: Yes.<br />7. Secure data transmission: Yes.</p>
<p>Re: Custom Domains: You can use CSS to hide the navbar. (It has no user-visible impact in terms of pageload, due to the caching that&#39;s done. So use CSS to hide the navbar and you&#39;re fine.)</p>
<p>I&#39;ve actually mocked up a change to search results that would be much more Google-like; probably won&#39;t happen this quarter but it&#39;s on our list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
